Mineable Cryptocurrencies in 2026: The Highest-Hashrate Coins by Network Data
Choosing a mineable cryptocurrency requires more than comparing a coin’s market price. A miner must also evaluate the mining algorithm, total network hashrate, difficulty, block reward, block interval, hardware compatibility, pool availability and operating costs. The figures below provide a current network-data snapshot for 15 mineable coins and assets.
This comparison is based on Minector’s internal data. Prices and network conditions can change quickly, so the figures should be treated as a reference for research rather than as definitive financial advice. In particular, a higher network hashrate or difficulty usually means more competition for miners using compatible hardware.
How Network Data Affects Coin Choice

Network hashrate represents the combined computational power securing or mining a network. When more miners contribute hashrate, the network generally becomes more competitive. A miner with the same hardware and efficiency will typically receive a smaller share of rewards as competing hashrate increases.
Difficulty is another important indicator. It describes how challenging it is to find a valid block under the network’s current rules. Higher difficulty does not automatically make a coin unprofitable, because the block reward and coin price also matter, but it means a miner must compete against a stronger field.
Block reward shows how many coins are issued for a successful block, while block time indicates how frequently blocks are expected to be found. A short block time can produce frequent reward events, but the reward per block may be small or distributed across a large network. Price gives the reward a market value, although price volatility, pool fees, electricity costs and hardware performance remain critical.
Mineable Coins Ranked by Network Hashrate
The table is ordered by the supplied network-hashrate data, from the largest reported figure to the smallest. Network hashrate and difficulty are not directly interchangeable across different algorithms, so comparisons are most useful between coins that can be mined with similar hardware.
| Coin | Algorithm | Network hashrate | Difficulty | Block reward | Block time (sec) | Price (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC — Bitcoin | SHA256 | 943712758047280000000.000000 | 132757073449490.000000 | 3.12500000 | 600.00 | 84534.00000000 |
| FB — Fractal Bitcoin | SHA256 | 363638406657630000000.000000 | 1027381498.000000 | 125.00000000 | 600.00 | 0.30500000 |
| PRL — Pearl | Pearl | 56397339453219000000.000000 | 30655630.696481 | 2302.84330196 | 153.00 | 1.45972388 |
| BCH — Bitcoin Cash | SHA256 | 3493496010663700000.000000 | 540092902044.750000 | 3.12500000 | 600.00 | 330.11000000 |
| MDL — modelOS | pearl-pow | 2619001539085200000.000000 | 127455566195.000000 | 83.97337757 | 600.00 | 0.00099900 |
| KAS — Kaspa | KHeavyHash | 331670642073810000.000000 | 33295259092522000.000000 | 22.97356450 | 1.00 | 0.04713691 |
| QUAI-SHA — Quai Sha | SHA256 | 226103139800350000.000000 | 178637236758640000.000000 | 5438.52346966 | 600.00 | 0.00873000 |
| BSV — Bitcoin SV | SHA256 | 187407442168020000.000000 | 27609428479.365000 | 3.12500000 | 600.00 | 21.68723089 |
| CKB — Nervos Network | Eaglesong | 88866217686418000.000000 | 806707776108930000.000000 | 720.54965567 | 10.00 | 0.00139124 |
| XEC — eCash | SHA256 | 62146972407204000.000000 | 6860286181.563300 | 1812500.00000000 | 600.00 | 0.00000870 |
| DGB-SHA — Digibyte | SHA256 | 33197702707009000.000000 | 538269254.000000 | 2005.82715952 | 600.00 | 0.00427000 |
| BC2 — Bitcoin II | SHA256 | 16747451575696000.000000 | 2834805589.060000 | 50.00000000 | 600.00 | 0.10557528 |
| BCH2 — Bitcoin Cash II | SHA256 | 9458391731059500.000000 | 1252227469.762600 | 50.00000000 | 600.00 | 0.04880000 |
| ALPH — Alephium | Blake3 | 5423669980324800.000000 | 163779603280810.000000 | 0.13973486 | 64.00 | 0.06126500 |
| BTCS — Bitcoin Silver | SHA256 | 4626204139405200.000000 | 382387790.768430 | 47.02194357 | 600.00 | 0.03040000 |
What the Highest-Hashrate Data Shows

Bitcoin and SHA256 competition
Bitcoin has the largest reported network hashrate in this dataset at 943712758047280000000.000000 and a difficulty of 132757073449490.000000. Its SHA256 block reward is 3.12500000, the block time is 600.00 seconds and the price is 84534.00000000 USD. These figures illustrate a mature, highly competitive mining market where specialized SHA256 hardware and efficient electricity access are especially important.
Several other SHA256 coins appear in the table, including Fractal Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Quai Sha, Bitcoin SV, eCash, Digibyte, Bitcoin II, Bitcoin Cash II and Bitcoin Silver. They have different network sizes, rewards, difficulty levels and prices. Because they share an algorithm, some miners may be able to compare them using compatible hardware, but profitability still depends on each coin’s current network conditions and market value.
Alternative algorithms and hardware requirements
Kaspa uses KHeavyHash and reports a block time of 1.00 second, with a block reward of 22.97356450 and a price of 0.04713691 USD. Its network hashrate is 331670642073810000.000000 and its difficulty is 33295259092522000.000000. These data points must be evaluated with KHeavyHash-compatible hardware rather than compared directly with SHA256 mining equipment.
Pearl uses the Pearl algorithm, while modelOS uses pearl-pow. Pearl reports a network hashrate of 56397339453219000000.000000, a block reward of 2302.84330196, a block time of 153.00 seconds and a price of 1.45972388 USD. modelOS reports 2619001539085200000.000000 network hashrate, a reward of 83.97337757, a 600.00-second block time and a price of 0.00099900 USD.
Nervos Network uses Eaglesong and has a 10.00-second block time. Its reported network hashrate is 88866217686418000.000000, difficulty is 806707776108930000.000000, block reward is 720.54965567 and price is 0.00139124 USD. Alephium uses Blake3, with a 64.00-second block time, a 0.13973486 block reward and a price of 0.06126500 USD.
Practical Factors for Miners
Start by matching the coin’s algorithm to hardware you already own or are considering. A high coin price does not help if the required equipment is unavailable, inefficient, or too expensive to operate. ASIC miners, GPUs and other devices can have very different performance and power characteristics across algorithms.
Next, use the network hashrate and difficulty as competition indicators. A coin with a lower difficulty may appear attractive, but the result can change when additional miners join. Also review pool fees, payout rules, minimum payouts, uptime and server locations before switching production to a less familiar network.
Finally, estimate revenue using the miner’s measured hashrate and power draw, not only the advertised specification. Electricity cost, cooling, maintenance, downtime, hardware depreciation and the coin’s price movement can all affect the outcome. Profitability calculators are useful for scenarios, but their results are estimates rather than guarantees.
Conclusion
The highest-hashrate coins in this dataset are not automatically the best choices for every miner. Bitcoin offers the largest SHA256 network and a price of 84534.00000000 USD, but its network hashrate and difficulty also show the scale of competition. Other SHA256 networks and alternative algorithms may offer different reward structures, block intervals and operating opportunities.
A sound comparison should combine algorithm compatibility, network hashrate, difficulty, block reward, block time, current price, pool conditions and electricity costs. Recheck these inputs regularly because mining economics can change without notice. This article is general information for research and should not be treated as financial, tax or legal advice.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the highest network hashrate mean the coin is the most profitable?
No. A high network hashrate generally indicates strong competition, not guaranteed profitability. Revenue also depends on the miner’s hashrate, efficiency, electricity price, pool fees, block reward and the coin’s market price.
Why should difficulty be compared with the algorithm?
Difficulty values are designed within a network’s own mining rules and are not always meaningful as a direct cross-algorithm ranking. Compare SHA256 coins with compatible SHA256 hardware, and evaluate KHeavyHash, Pearl, Eaglesong or Blake3 coins with the equipment designed for those algorithms.
What does block time tell a miner?
Block time is the expected interval between blocks. Shorter intervals can produce more frequent reward events, while longer intervals may mean fewer events with a different reward structure. Pool payout timing can still differ from the underlying block interval.
How often should mining data be checked?
Check network hashrate, difficulty, reward schedules, price, pool fees and electricity assumptions regularly. These inputs can change, and a calculation that was attractive at one point may produce a different result later.
